Published on December 25, 2005 By drmiler In Politics
All of us here at JU have tried, but you still don't seem to get it no matter what we do. Col I was not coming outright and saying that your post was false. What I "was" saying is that I'm not going to bother trying to prove or disprove it. No matter what "proof" we give you to the contrary, you either ignore it or dismiss it. It's just not worth the hassle to me.


No, we just don't feel like falling for the sheer stupidity of this. The problem with you is this. No matter how much proof is given to you to disprove your position, even if the source is unimpeachable....you will either ignore the proof or dismiss it out of hand. So have at it clueless one. You'll get no more points from me on this except the 5 your getting from this.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 25, 2005
bump for the cluess old liberal.
on Dec 25, 2005

Doc, I long ago stopped replying to him.  I even replied to Dabe!  At least she had some variance!  I think he is just a bot.  Cause his message never changes!

Merry Christmas!

on Dec 25, 2005
Give it a break guys. This from a solid athiest, respect the day and cease hostilities. You've got 364 more where you can continue berating the man.

Have a good holiday. Best wishes in the new year.
on Dec 25, 2005

Moderator hat on:

DO NOT post this kind of thing to the forums.

on Dec 26, 2005
Moderator hat on:
DO NOT post this kind of thing to the forums.


Why not? The second paragraph is a reply from one of the col's threads. The first paragraph is what actually started this thread. Link Please check reply #5. I will do as you ask but I really would like to understand why you are asking it.
on Dec 26, 2005
All I can say is that I /salute Dr.Miler for taking the position of ignoring, or at least not directly replying in, the Clueless Old Liberal's threads.

As Little Whip and others have said, let his threads die of the loneliness they deserve.

If you really feel compelled to reply to whatever his latest rant is, start a new article and argue the issues there. Earn the points for yourself and let him keep going on the point deficit trail as everyone with an ounce of sense just uses their daily "trolling" votes on his crap.
on Dec 26, 2005
All I can say is that I /salute Dr.Miler for taking the position of ignoring, or at least not directly replying in, the Clueless Old Liberal's threads.

As Little Whip and others have said, let his threads die of the loneliness they deserve.

If you really feel compelled to reply to whatever his latest rant is, start a new article and argue the issues there. Earn the points for yourself and let him keep going on the point deficit trail as everyone with an ounce of sense just uses their daily "trolling" votes on his crap.


Thank you sir. Now if I can just get an answer from Brad, I'll be doing good.
on Jan 06, 2006
I done went and did it yet again. Gotta watch that. Posting on a clueless thread is just that! Clueless!
on Jan 06, 2006

done went and did it yet again. Gotta watch that. Posting on a clueless thread is just that! Clueless!

I posted on one of his, only because someone else referenced the article.  So I just posted one thing. Pfft!  Have the 5 points Col Klink!

on Jan 12, 2006
I really wonder just how much of an idiot someone can be. Info is given to refute a given point! The info is more or less irrefutable. And yet the info is ignored and they just go right back to their original talking point which was proven false! Kind of makes me wonder. I'm sure we all know who I'm talking aboout don't we? I keep watching it happen time and time again. We "all" need to stop feeding the idiotic troll!
on Jan 12, 2006
We "all" need to stop feeding the idiotic troll!

I am a bad culprit of that, especially the last few days. But his rants have such paper thin arguments, not based in fact... and then he just doesn't get it...

I foreswore myself publicly from responding once... but I could not turn away.

Then he started coming to my articles and posting there... drawing me back...

I need a clean break from COL Curmudgeon.

HI, I'M SINGRDAVE, AND I'M A COL-A-HOLIC.

HI, DAVE.
on Jan 12, 2006
And he cannot spell to save his life.
on Jan 12, 2006
And he cannot spell to save his life.


TOO TRUE! But he is supposed to be an ex-army officer? I seriously doubt that. Either that or his mind is gone!

Hmmmmmm that "would" explain a lot of things, wouldn't it?
on Jan 12, 2006

HI, I'M SINGRDAVE, AND I'M A COL-A-HOLIC.

HI, DAVE.

Hi Dave!  I am a recovering Col-a-holic!  Just remember the mantra of the club "The world is not a Bush Oyster".

on Jan 12, 2006
But he is supposed to be an ex-army officer? I seriously doubt that. Either that or his mind is gone!

Supposed to be? Any time anyone calls him on it, he regales them with his 30+ years as an Army Reserve officer and that he has an MBA from Lehigh University. He probably had a secretary do his spelling for him. And since he started writing books, he must have gone through four copy editors...

The world is not a Bush oyster... the world is not a Bush oyster...
2 Pages1 2