I tried once to stop replying to him. I have better chances of stopping from drinking so much Coca-Cola. I even tried to understand him and make him understand why we believe the opposite of almost everything he says, but it was a waste of time. He is not here to debate, only to put his point accross and no one elses matters. Gotta wonder how he hates Bush so much for acting like King as he says yet his words are almighty and no one elses matters. It takes an idiot to recognize an idiot I guess.

He is not here to debate, only to put his point accross and no one elses matters.

I think that is the most irritating thing about his threads. He's not here to learn or to be open minded. Is he desperately looking for validation?

He has said he's putting together another book... Maybe he's vetting new talking points and using us as sounding boards?

Thought this wasn't meant to be posted to the forums?!?

He has said he's putting together another book... Maybe he's vetting new talking points and using us as sounding boards?

You said it right, putting together. He can not spell if his life depended on it so someone else must be writing it for him.

It is possible that he will use alot of our answers to prove what ever points he will try to prove. Here's an interesting thing though, I bet that, if he makes any sales, that he will not make one single decent donation to any charity that helps poor people, you know the ones he's always crying about.

Thought this wasn't meant to be posted to the forums?!?

And why would that be? We are not making a joke of him nor are we calling him names, bad or otherwise. As I read it we are not breaking TOU in any fashion.

And why would that be?

Uh, cause back in comment #6, Draginol told you to remove it from the forums...

And why would that be? Uh, cause back in comment #6, Draginol told you to remove it from the forums...

And ummmmmm he "never" bothered to reply as to why I was supposed to. And like I said before, there is nothing in this that violates the TOU.

And ummmmmm he "never" bothered to reply as to why I was supposed to

I think "cause he said so" is a good enough reason, I mean, it is his site afterall. Do you really think that "how can you be so dense" is not calling someone a name?

And ummmmmm he "never" bothered to reply as to why I was supposed to I think "cause he said so" is a good enough reason, I mean, it is his site afterall. Do you really think that "how can you be so dense" is not calling someone a name?

Excuse me? Did I name names in the title? No, I didn't! I think you'll find orginally Brad was upset because the original title was "How can you be so stupid". Which I very promptly changed after he said something. And just an fyi.... saying how can you be so dense would not be considered calling names if it's "NOT ADDRESSED TO SOMEONE IN PARTICULAR"! To make it name calling would require that I say something like "xxx is being dense"! Not much in the way of name calling is it? Especially since I have been called much worse on his blog!

You know shades, this is not the first time we have crossed swords and more than likely will not be the last. But I defy you to find anything here that is not the truth.

Especially since I have been called much worse on his blog!

I would like to know what names they have called you so that I don't repeat them in case I ever feel the need to call you a name. I like to be unique sometimes.

Especially since I have been called much worse on his blog! I would like to know what names they have called you so that I don't repeat them in case I ever feel the need to call you a name. I like to be unique sometimes.

The one that pissed me off the most was when he called "me" an idiot.