I start off with a challenge. The recent trend in ID flapdoodle is to maintain -- vociferously -- that they aren't trying to put religion into classrooms. Very well. The challenge is, then, to demonstrate proof on an intelligence that could produce the myriad life-forms on this planet. If you can do it scientifically, I'll bow to you and be all for teaching ID in a science class.




Lets get something straight! Intelligent design is NOT about religion that's creationism. Since "when" is alien intervention considered religion? Secondly there is NOTHING stating they want to "teach" ID in the classroom! All they're talking about is "mentioning" it!

Comments
on Aug 12, 2005
bump
on Aug 12, 2005
There is a huge difference between insisting that ID is taught in the classroom, and insisting that evolution isn't offered as proof of the non-existance of God in the classroom.

Neither side has any proof about the existance of God, so neither side should have any say about religious belief in a publicly funded school. Myrrander likes to divert things. There's nothing more skeptical about Myrrander, he's as full of a priori belief as anyone else, he just thinks his flavor of belief makes him seem more intelligent.