Reprint from Media Research Center. Ok, now I sit back and wait for the left to attack.

Retired Major General Donald Shepperd toured the Guantanamo Bay detention facility on Friday and found that reality did not match the media's portrayal, he recounted in a phone interview from Cuba on CNN just before 3pm EDT on Friday. Shepperd asserted: "The impressions that you're getting from the media and from the various pronouncements being made by people who have not been here, in my opinion, are totally false." Shepperd contended that "what we're seeing is a modern prison system with dedicated people, interrogators and analysts that know what they are doing. And people being very, very well-treated." But when Shepperd reported that he had observed an interrogation, anchor Betty Nguyen inquired: "Kind of explain to us how that played out. And were there any instances of abuse or possible abuse?" Shepperd responded: "Absolutely not."

The MRC's Ken Shepherd corrected the CNN transcript against the video for the phone interview which began at 2:51pm EDT on June 24:

Betty Nguyen, anchor: "We have just established a line to Guantanamo Bay, to our military analyst General Don Shepperd. He arrived there as part of a trip put together by the Pentagon in the wake of that human rights report that criticized conditions at the U.S. prison for war detainees. General Shepperd on the phone with us right now. General Shepperd, what do you see so far while being there?"
Major General Donald Shepperd, Retired, CNN military analyst: "Well, I tell you what, Betty, I'm seeing a lot of rain right now. I thought Cuba was dry and we're in the middle of a drenching rain storm. But I tell you, every American should have a chance to see what our group saw today. The impressions that you're getting from the media and from the various pronouncements being made by people who have not been here, in my opinion, are totally false.
"What we're seeing is a modern prison system with dedicated people, interrogators and analysts that know what they are doing. And people being very, very well-treated. We've had a chance to tour the facility, to talk to the guards, to talk to the interrogators and analysts. We've had a chance to eat what the prisoners eat. We've seen people, high-value people, being interrogated. And it's nothing like the impression that we're getting from the media. People need to see this, Betty."
Nguyen: "All right. You said you got to talk to the interrogators and the guards. Let's start with the interrogators. What have they told you so far?
Shepperd: "The interrogators -- basically we have the opinion from things that we've heard that people down here have been mistreated. Everyone that we've talked to -- and this is consistent with things I've known from the past -- every interrogator will tell you that the key to getting information you need is to establish a personal relationship based upon respect over a long period of time with the people.
"People won't talk necessarily at first, but eventually, they will begin to talk and you'll get pieces of information that you can fit together with pieces of information from somewhere else. But they say pressure does not work, disrespect does not work, and torture is absolutely something that is counterproductive. You need to make to make people feel comfortable and comfortable with you to get the information you need. And that came from everyone, men and women, that were interrogators down here. And again, it's consistent with what I've heard in this past."
Nguyen: "Now, this leads me to my next question. Of course, this was a trip organized by the Pentagon. So do you feel like you're getting full access to everything there? Are you seeing a true picture of how it is?"
Shepperd: "Yeah, that's always a good question. But I tell you that they are proud to have people down here, including the press, to see what we are seeing. Obviously, they're going to put their best foot forward, And obviously, no matter where you are, there will be from time to time abuses or people misusing or disobeying the regulations, no matter where you are in the process. But I tell you, I've been in prisons and I've been in jails in the United States, and this is by far the most professionally-run and dedicated force I've ever seen in any correctional institution anywhere."
Nguyen: "You also mentioned that you have spoken with guards. What are they saying?"
Shepperd: "Very interesting. I had lunch with a -- one of the female guards and then I talked to a group of male guards as well. I said, do you ever see anything go on here that resembles mistreatment of the prisoners or mistreatment by the prisoners of guard? And they say, we're on alert all the time. They're not armed when they're around the guards [sic] for obvious reasons. You don't do that because weapons can be taken and used against you. But basically, they treat the prisoners firmly, with respect. They don't engage in a lot of banter with them. And they say that the prisoners do things that we've heard about in the media. They sometimes get riled and they'll throw feces, they'll throw urine at the guards. But this entire system is based upon compliance. In other words, if you comply with the rules, you're going to be treated well, you're going to be given more privileges, just like any detention facility. And if you don't, your life is going to be much more miserable than those who do...."
Nguyen: "On the flip side, have you had access to the prisoners themselves and what are their conditions?"
Shepperd: "We have not had access to the prisoners themselves. We are told what they are and we have seen all the facilities and we have watched interrogations. We just watched interrogations of two high-value prisoners -- what they can determine is high-value targets or high-value prisoners that have been here for a considerable amount of time. The facilities are basic of prisoners anywhere. We've seen the cells. They're seven-by-eight foot cells. They're clean. They have a toilet in the facility, they have and a water fountain in the facility. They have a bed. They're given the Koran, they're given a mattress, they're given clothes, recreational things such as playing cards, chess, checkers, that type of thing. We have not had access to talk to the prisoners. And again, that's one thing that you've got to be very careful of. You want to establish a prisoner relationship with the interrogators and not have that proliferated with other people."
Nguyen: "Let's back up for just a moment, because you said you said watched an interrogation.
Shepperd: "Yes."
Nguyen: "Kind of explain to us how that played out. And were there any instances of abuse or possible abuse?"
Shepperd: "Absolutely not. These -- when I sat and watched them, I want to be very careful in describing them. And I don't want to describe how we watched or anything of that sort. But basically, you're able to observe interrogations. They have various ways of monitoring the interrogations and what have you and letting you see what's going on. With the interrogations that we watched were interrogators, there were translators that translated for the detainee and there were also intelligence people in there.
"And they're basically asking questions. They just ask the same questions over a long period of time. They get information about the person's family, where they're from, other people they knew. All the type of things that you would want in any kind of criminal investigation. And these were all very cordial, very professional. There was laughing in two of them that we in the two of them that we watched-"
Nguyen: "Laughing in an interrogation?!"
Shepperd: Yes, indeed. It's not -- it's not like the impression that you and I have of what goes on in an interrogation, where you bend people's arms and mistreat people. They're trying to establish a firm professional relationship where they have respect for each other and can talk to each other. And yes, there were laughing and humor going on in a couple of these things. And I'm talking about a remark made where someone will smirk or laugh or chuckle."
Nguyen: "Mm hmm. All right. General Don Shepperd, we appreciate your time and that look inside Gitmo, with you being there on this tour. Thank you for that. And of course, we invite you to stay tuned, because there's much more Live From coming up."

(Late Update: Shepperd appeared live, on-camera, this morning (Monday) during the 9am EDT hour of CNN's American Morning to recount what he observed at Guantanamo.)

Comments
on Jun 29, 2005
bump
on Jun 29, 2005
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/5/30/193632.shtml
Well there are witnesses who say otherwise. When they're allowed to speak that is. While any article should be considered thoroughly, for me, the clincher is the fact that the Gitmo witnesses speak of their torture experiences involving dogs. We all know the evil GI interrogators were using vicious dogs on the detainees. This is another example of facts being skewed. I shudder to think about what else they do there. AbuGraib was bad enough, but Gitmo is not accessible for any reporters so the detainees are never heard from until they are lucky enough to be released. Gitmo is a war crime in that the detainees can't see the 'evidence' against them, nor have any access to legal counsel. If the US claims to be exporting democracy, they ought to start treating the supposed bad guys under then umbrella of international laws to show the world they mean what they say.
And we need to see if this general has any contact with the drug addict who goes by the name as Rush.
on Jun 29, 2005

100 People could report back, all with no agenda, and the loons will not believe them.  They will only believe those that have an overt negative agenda as that is the only thing they want to hear.

I would not try convincing any of them, it is an exercise in futility.  Ignorance is curable. Chronic stupidity is not.

on Jun 29, 2005
Well there are witnesses who say otherwise. When they're allowed to speak that is. While any article should be considered thoroughly, for me, the clincher is the fact that the Gitmo witnesses speak of their torture experiences involving dogs. We all know the evil GI interrogators were using vicious dogs on the detainees. This is another example of facts being skewed. I shudder to think about what else they do there. AbuGraib was bad enough, but Gitmo is not accessible for any reporters so the detainees are never heard from until they are lucky enough to be released. Gitmo is a war crime in that the detainees can't see the 'evidence' against them, nor have any access to legal counsel. If the US claims to be exporting democracy, they ought to start treating the supposed bad guys under then umbrella of international laws to show the world they mean what they say. And we need to see if this general has any contact with the drug addict who goes by the name as Rush.


Why don't you GET A CLUE! This is from an "EYE WITNESS" (just an FYI...that means someone who was "actually" there)! What more do you want? And your link....is from a ex-prisoner. What do you expect him to say?
on Jun 29, 2005
Well there are witnesses who say otherwise.



Let's not forget claiming abuse against your captures is in the al qaeda training books.
on Jun 29, 2005
Hey Reiki, Your brain cell is getting lonely!
on Jun 29, 2005
Just for the sake of argument, what makes you certain that the base was not on its best behavior in anticipation of the General's visit? This is a routine thing in the military...lots of preparation and high conduct standards during a visit from an important guest.
on Jun 29, 2005
Just for the sake of argument, what makes you certain that the base was not on its best behavior in anticipation of the General's visit? This is a routine thing in the military...lots of preparation and high conduct standards during a visit from an important guest.


Because ALL of the people who went down there (there was more than one including a couple of senators.) had basically the "same"things to say. One of the senators had the nerve to say, okay it isn't happening here but I'll bet it happening somewhere else. These were not her exact words.
on Jun 29, 2005
Hehe, I am pleasantly surprised by your response. Thanks.